rabbit anti mouse tollip (Boster Bio)
Structured Review

Rabbit Anti Mouse Tollip, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti mouse tollip/product/Boster Bio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Xuebijing exerts protective effects on lung permeability leakage and lung injury by upregulating Toll-interacting protein expression in rats with sepsis."
Article Title: Xuebijing exerts protective effects on lung permeability leakage and lung injury by upregulating Toll-interacting protein expression in rats with sepsis.
Journal: International journal of molecular medicine
doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1943
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 1. Effect of XBJ on the mRNA expression of Tollip, IRAK1, TLR4, NF-κB65 and TRAF6 in lung tissue. Groups of mice were challenged with CLP and treated with XBJ 24 h later. The expression of Tollip, IRAK1, TLR4, NF-κB65 and TRAF6 in lung tissue was determined by RT-PCR. Representative RT-PCR shows the level of Tollip, IRAK1, TLR4, NF-κB65, and TRAF6 expression in the four rat groups. M, marker; A, normal control group; B, sham operation group; C, control group; D, treatment group.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Marker, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. Administration of XBJ led to increased expression levels of Tollip mRNA, and inhibition of TLR4, NF-κB65 and TRAF6 mRNA expression in lung tissue in CLP-ALI mice. The expression of Tollip, IRAK1, TLR4, NF-κB65 and TRAF6 in lung tissue was determined by RT-PCR. Statistical summary of the densitometric analysis of Tollip, IRAK1, TLR4, NF-κB65 and TRAF6 expression in the four rat groups. Data are presented as mean ± stan dard deviation of one experiment consisting of three replicates. Experiments were performed in triplicate; ﹡P<0.05 and ﹡﹡P<0.01 vs. normal control group and sham operation group. ﹟P<0.05 and ﹟﹟P<0.01 vs. control group.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Inhibition, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 4. Administration of XBJ enhanced the expression of Tollip protein protein, and inhibition TLR4, NF-κB65, p-IRAK1 and TRAF6 protein expression in lung tissue in CLP-ALI mice. Groups of mice were challenged with LPS and treated with salidroside 24 h later. Tollip, p-IRAK1, TLR4, NF-κB65 and TRAF6 were assayed by western blot analysis. Statistical summary of the densitometric analysis of Tollip, p-IRAK1, TLR4, NF-κB65 and TRAF6 protein expression in the four rat groups. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of one experiment consisting of three replicates. Experiments were performed in triplicate; ﹡﹡P<0.01 vs. the normal control group and sham operation group. ﹟P<0.05, ﹟﹟P<0.01 vs. the control group.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Inhibition, Western Blot, Standard Deviation, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 3. Administration of XBJ enhanced the expression of Tollip protein, and inhibition of TLR4, NF-κB65, p-IRAK1 and TRAF6 protein expression in lung tissue in CLP-ALI mice. Groups of mice were challenged with LPS and treated with salidroside 24 h later. Tollip, p-IRAK1, TLR4, NF-κB65 and TRAF6 were assayed by western blot analysis. Representative western blots show the level of Tollip, p-IRAK1, TLR4, NF-κB65 and TRAF6 protein expression in the four rat groups. A, normal control group; B, sham operation group; C, control group; D, treatment group.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Inhibition, Western Blot, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 5. Administration of XBJ upregulated Tollip positive protein in lung tissue in CLP-ALI mice. Groups of mice were challenged with CLP and treated with XBJ 24 h later. Tollip positive protein levels of lung tissue were determined using immunohistochemistry and the average proportion of positive expres sion in each field was counted using the true color multi-functional cell image analysis management system. Values are expressed as mean ± SD; ﹡﹡P<0.01 vs. normal control group and sham operation group. ﹟P<0.05 and ﹟﹟P<0.01 vs. control group.
Techniques Used: Immunohistochemistry, Functional Assay, Control
